The military have learned to exert some control over media reports of their operations by ‘embedding’ journalists into operational units. Embedded journalists are not free to choose where they go and what they see, instead they have to remain with the unit they are embedded into and to the extent that they identify with the culture of the unit they are in, they lose a critical measure of objectivity.
Currently, the crisis of the financial establishment is largely reported in the financial press and financial columns by journalists effectively embedded in the financial establishment. This is exemplified clearly in the extent to which the Lex column has itself, become embedded in the financial establishment. Who benefits from the absence of robust criticism of a rotten system?
Is The Financial Times is an example of a newspaper dependant upon the financial establishment for sources of news. Is the F.T. the new Pravda* ?
Today, Lex writes about the revival of the ‘carry trade’. The borrowing of low-yielding currencies to buy in a higher yielding one. After a rambling account of the current revival Lex concludes without an explanation. But Lex comes close to stumbling on the only rational explanation when he states:
“For the truth is that carry trade opportunities should not exist at all: the whole point of flexible exchange rates is to rebalance things when interest rates get out of whack”
There is only one explanation which fits and that is for one significant investing class, the carry trade is a penalty free trade.
A carry trade by a fund whose managers would keep 20% of any profit but would bear no personal losses if it became loss making.
It’s called a hedge fund stupid!
Bun rating, 10% meat but no gut is embedded in the steak.